Serene state of mind

　　

4. This year 2025 is a year of National Census.
Investigation paper, which is distributed by household, can include only four people at maximum.
The manual says that if the household consists of more than four people, they have to go to city or ward of town office and get extra investigation documents.
Not only family consisted of three generations but also families with a couple and three or more children are obliged to get extra paper
-Now we can submit through internet, though.
Although this should be a matter of size,
National Census paper for only people can show that Authorities assume a couple who consists family has two children.
In other words, three or more children per couple is out of the scope of the assumption.
For not only Authorities but also society.
For example, employers don't welcome employees to take more than twice.
During twentieth century, cookbooks placed ingredients for four people, which is supposed for a couple and two children.
Now most of the recipe places ingredients for two people, and it's much easier to calculate depending on number of people.
-The examples could be a mile long, but no matter how Panjandrums urge women to have three or more children,
As long as we have imprinting that we are supposed to have two children at most, in addition to all kinds of hardships in childcare, general public won't,
While by simple arithmetic, population won't increase unless a couple has more than two children.

5. Husband is a Christian, and belongs to a local church.
Recently, in this Church, they set an age limitation in selecting directing members; seventy and below.
The reason is to give younger people opportunity to become the board, and concerns of elderly members' health problem.
However, I'm afraid that age limitation can take away people to serve directing role eventually.
I imagine that they should extend until seventy-five, even if they require health conditions.
Now, a law obligates employers to hire people until sixty-five, and set obligation for sincere effort to give employees opportunity to work until seventy.
Due to labor shortage brought by birth decline and pension cutoff, fewer and fewer elderly can afford living on only on pension.
Not so many people can serve church full-time.
-Well... not only religious communities but also all kinds of community activities must be facing similar problems,
Since they've been dependent on gratuitous service labor.

6. After a female president of the current Ruling party was elected, coalition of two ruling parties broke up.
The one that announced breakup is a political party whose parent organization is a religious body.
After their Coalition lasted for more than a quarter century, quite a few General public must regard those two Political parties in the same light,
At least I'm the one who do.
While I've read the Religious organization appealing peace, people's network, belief and effort, this Political party's inconsistency of speech and action stands out.
Besides, this Political party contravenes principle of separation of church and state.
They would have no right to complain if general public guess that Religious party assemblies must have made profits by bribery just like current Ruling party assemblies.
-Although the Religious party explained the main reason of their Coalition breakup was they couldn't get understandable answers about solution of bribery problems.
Now after Coalition broke up and at least, they cannot stay an ass in a lion's skin.
If there's something to say for Religious party, can they appeal idealistic theory of their Religion and win general public's votes, without nuisance telemarketing?

◆：Ready to place summery if asked



Who is 800,000th visitor!?