Rakeshraoのブログ

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis, often regarded as Hollywood's golden couple, have recently found themselves in an unexpected and uncomfortable position - apologizing. The circumstances leading up to this apology have left many who've followed their seemingly flawless careers bewildered.

The apologies, addressed to Judge Charlaine Olmedo prior to her sentencing of their "That '70s Show" co-star, Danny Masterson, to 30 years to life for two counts of rape, became viral sensations after being obtained by independent journalist Tony Ortega. However, what struck readers and viewers the most was the uncomfortable tone of unwavering self-assuredness that permeated both the letters and their accompanying apology video.

In her letter, Kunis declared, "We support victims. We have done this historically through our work and will continue to do so in the future." While advocating for a friend's reduced sentence is not uncommon in the legal system, it hardly aligns with the notion of "supporting victims." Furthermore, Kunis' assertion that "the letters were not written to question the legitimacy or the validity of the jury's ruling" contradicts the letters' repeated emphasis on Masterson's opposition to drug use. It's almost as if Kutcher and Kunis approached the brink of suggesting that the claim of Masterson using date-rape drugs in the two cases for which he was convicted was unfounded. Mitigation is one thing; re-litigation is another.

The apology video itself is a peculiar artifact of contemporary fame. Both stars appear disheveled as if they had just rolled out of bed, wearing crumpled T-shirts. If the goal was to offer viewers an unfiltered glimpse into their lives, it missed the mark by a wide margin. Instead, it seems to exude a self-conscious drama akin to a hostage video or the infamous 2020 "Imagine" video, where celebrities attempted to create their own reality. Interestingly, Kutcher and Kunis had previously parodied this very video on the show "The Boys." As they take turns reading from a script, they appear visibly uncomfortable. Surprisingly, Kutcher comes across as the more skilled performer, perhaps because he was assigned the less challenging segments that didn't directly contradict the conclusions drawn by those who read the letters. Kunis, on the other hand, adopts a sanctimonious tone as she enumerates the ways they respect the legal system and its judgments, while Kutcher adopts a more conversational tone as if he were explaining things to a child. The unedited moment when Kunis leans forward to turn off the camera remains, suggesting that they may view it as the end of the conversation.

​Read More​