Serene state of mind

　　　

(Previous)

7. I've read that new policies have been under discussion about international human resources development.
I accuse that this Project is completely wrong.
Human resources development policies must be for non-regular employees who lost opportunities under Employment ice age, not international cheap labor.
During Employment ice age, employers discarded workers, and deprived youth back then of opportunities to gain career and make enough money for marriage and childbirth.
Youth back then made realistic choices to adopt reality, and refrained from marriage and childbirth.
That's mainly why third baby boom didn't come.
Now, employers selfishly complain current labor shortage that they've brought upon themselves, and count on cheap international labor.
It's too late for too many of those obscured people to marry and have children, since most of them are over physical reproductive period.
Those employers must expiate, in order to make those Lost generation people enable to make a living by themselves for life.

8. It's important to set unified rules about political fundings and its information disclosure.
At the same time, it's more important to plug loopholes in the law against bribes first.
While thirty-nine assemblies were sentenced to punishment over political fund parties, no question was asked for Premier Kishida.
Superfluously: Is our nation and media so slack to argue over illegal gambling by the Baseball Superstar's exclusive Interpreter?
At least, can't they be patient to wait for official investigation?
As is already questioned everywhere, our nation's first interest must be illegal political funding parties by current Ruling party,
Assailants who caused bullicide of an actress and still don't apologize to her bereaved family,
And ongoing wars, disaster countermeasures, and so on. (In random order)
Baseball players who cut more conspicuous figures abroad than in our state have chosen international transfers partly because our nation is such wretch, haven't they?

9. As mentioned above, current Cabinet is under attack, and approval ratings keep on declining.
Even under such situation, they still remain in their current position.
Is it proper to question?
Voters who voted for current Ruling parties at the latest national elections, did you vote carefully? Or did you give them sloppy or noncommittal vote?
The matter is simple: People who feel disgruntled by current Ruling parties and Panjandrums may as well vote for their opponents at the next nationwide national election.
　No abstention from voting, OK?
　　The matter is WHEN it comes, though.
According to Husband, a Buddhist scholar lamented in one of his books how our nation clings to familiar misfortune;
The past shows it that they endured misgovernment by Ruling parties that control our state for decades, and once they outvoted the Ruling party once, but they ran out of patience with replaced Ruling party in no time after 3.11 Earthquake disasters, and made current Ruling party restore by election, allowing current money politics and national life destruction policies.
As well as Panjandrums, do general public has willing to change our state?　



Who is 690,000th visitor!?