2018/12/4 (火) グローバルヒストリー・セミナー合同研究会
皆さま 12月4日（火）にグローバルヒストリー・セミナーと合同で、以下のように、ベトナムから気鋭の研究者をお招きして海域アジア史研究会特別例会を開催いたします。詳細は以下をご覧下さい。 今回の研究会は、開催曜日・時間が通常とは異なっておりますので、ご注意下さい。 年末の平日ということでお忙しい時期と存じますが、皆さまの参加をお待ちしております。 なお、12月22日（土）には海域アジア史研究会12月例会を開催する予定です。こちらのご案内は後日改めて差し上げます。【海域アジア史研究会特別例会】 共催：グローバルヒストリー・セミナー（第73回） オーガナイザー：大橋厚子（名古屋大学）日時：2018年12月4日（火） 16時～18時場所：大阪大学豊中キャンパス文法経済学部本館2階 大会議室 アクセス: http://let.osaka-u.ac.jp/ja/access 豊中キャンパスマップ(4)の逆向き「コ の字」型建物が会場のある建物です（大会議室は左上隅に位置します）。大会議室には、(3)の総合図書館側の入口から入って、右手の階段をあがり、廊下を右側にお進み下さい。階段手前の右側の部屋が会場の大会議室です。講師（敬称略） ：Vu Duc Liem (Hanoi National University of Education, University of Hamburg)題目 ：State and Society in Early Nineteenth Century Vietnam: The Quest for a New History「極限のナショナルヒストリー」とも言える状況にあったベトナムの歴史学界は、20世紀末からグローバルな関係性を追求する方向に大きな変化を遂げつつあります。その中で現れた新世代のリーダーの一人であるヴー・ドゥク・リエムさんをお招きして、19世紀阮朝の新しい像を紹介していただくことになりました。現在の領土や国家アイデンティティの原型を確立させた阮朝期をどう位置づけるか、近世後期ベトナムとそれを取り巻く地域の社会経済変動にグローバル／リージョナルな観点から取り組む日本の研究者とどう対話するかなどの点で、興味深いセミナーになると期待しています。ふるってご参加ください。 報告要旨、講師紹介は以下の通りです。同様のものを本メールに添付致します。 なお終了後に懇親会を予定していますので、参加希望者は事前に桃木至朗（momoki@let.osaka-u.ac.jp）までご連絡いただければ幸いです。 世話人：秋田 茂(Abstract) Forty-one years ago, historian Alexander Woodside published the groundbreaking work on early Nguyen state (Vietnam and the Chinese model, Cambridge: 1971). Despite of many criticisms on its approach, the book, remains one of the only works on the topic in English, is still an indispensable source for understanding this period of Vietnamese history. Since then, there have been more materials come out, and new researches on the field prevail, enrich the body of knowledge on early 19th century Vietnam’s statecraft, institutions, court factionalism, regional conflict, and the project of centralization and imperialism. It is thus the time for a new history of the Nguyen that written in the 21st century. This talk attempts to present a holistic survey of a significant period of Vietnamese historical transition. For the first time “Vietnam” as a state and a territory took the shape as seen today, where early modern “national identity” was generated, where state’s centralization defined the country’s political culture, and imperial expansion fashioned the multiethnic discourse of the society. Last but not least were Vietnam’s bitter experience of regional expansion in Cambodia (1830s) and unsuccessful “modernization” – the two had cost the country a huge price, including nearly a century of western colonialism, and haunted the social collective memory about the dynasty. In modern historical discourse, the Nguyen counted nothing but a failed state. By taking them all into consideration, this presentation will challenge both conventional Vietnamese historiography which portrayed a reactionary and declined feudal state, based on their nationalist and Marxist approaches; and Western scholarship which overemphasized political model, whether of Chinese, indigenous, or Southeast Asian (Alexander B. Woodside, John K. Whitmore, Nola Cooke…). Instead, this is a reflection of my journey in searching for a new Nguyen history which started several years ago. I have found it useful to gather new materials and take a broader approach to the topic of early 19th century Vietnam’s state and society, not only to collate with Chinese experiences, but also to connect with those of Southeast Asia, and locate Vietnam in the global perspective. Liberated from a terminological and ideological limitation, this history is hoped to provide an alternative story of a more diverse, inclusive, and sophisticated sociopolitical transformation under which the first phrase of early modern Vietnam was in the making. The suggestion is to shift image of the Nguyen from a failed dynasty to an early modern state with centralized state-building, and efforts of empire-making. In many aspects, their legacies had prepared Vietnam to enter “modernity”. In fact, the Nguyen’s contribution to governance and influence on society are more profound than what have been projected by contemporary scholarship. Major discussed subjects in the talk are included: 1. New sources of the Nguyen history, comprising Vermilion records (阮朝硃本), land records (地簿), imperial writings (御製詩, 御製文)…2. Factionalism, interest group, and power network of the Nguyen court.3. Minh Menh’s project of state-centralization and empire-building. 4. Vietnam as an empire (大國): the making of early modern political and social identity. 5. Nguyen’s failure of “modernization”: regionalizing and internationalizing early 19th century VietnamKeywords: Nguyen dynasty, early modern Vietnam, political history, modernization, Minh Menh(About the author) Vũ Đức Liêm is a faculty member at the Department of History, Hanoi National University of Education in Vietnam. He is finishing his dissertation on the early modern Vietnam’s archival and political history at Hamburg University, Germany. His previous education and training also engaged with Chulalongkorn University (Thailand) and National University of Singapore. His publications focus on early modern Vietnam and political history. Among his recent publications are: ・Vu Duc Liem. “Vietnam at the Khmer Frontier: Boundary Politics, 1802–1847,” Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 5, no. 2 (2016): 534–64, doi:10.1353/ach.2016.0018.・Vu Duc Liem. “The Age of Sea Falcons: Naval Warfare in Vietnam, 1771-1802.” In Warring Societies of Pre-Colonial Southeast Asia: Local Cultures of Conflict Within a Regional Context, edited by Kathryn Wellen and Michael Charney, 103–29 (Copenhagen: NIAS, 2017).・Vu Duc Liem. Village rebellion and social violence in early nineteenth century Vietnam, in A Global History of Early Modern Violence, eds., Peter H. Wilson, Marie Houllemare and Erica Charters (Manchester: Manchester University Press, forthcoming).
出産・子育て
ファッション
美容・コスメ
健康・ダイエット
生活・インテリア
料理・食べ物
ドリンク・お酒
ペット
趣味・ゲーム
映画・ＴＶ
音楽
読書・コミック
旅行・海外情報
園芸
スポーツ
アウトドア・釣り
車・バイク
パソコン・家電
そのほか
すべてのジャンル
