Pyromanias
In this autumn, a midnight TV drama is a boomlet.The heroine is a shrewd writer who is obsessed with chasing and exposing scandals.Actually, her husband was a promising statesman, but he killed himself due to fabricated scandals.Heroine is aiming to take vengeance against people who entrapped her husband by bringing scandals they've actually committed into light; "An eye for an eye, scandals for scandals"Surely, people like politicians, entertainers, and managers of large companies are exposed to public.People who committed illegal or immoral acts must compensate as they deserve, needless to say.At the same time... Heroine might have options to bring formal charges with illegal acts that targets have actually committed by reporting proof to the police, and expose targets' illicit love affairs to family members of each.Without general public and online white-hat wannabes who leap at scandal dopes, Heroine's signature phrase snapping that get flamed to the marrow cannot sound convincing, And Black Revenge by abusing public media might not be accomplished.As for this drama, the true subject is love that Heroine tries to carry out even by disgracing herself.Its theme song by my favorite band expresses this, too.(Translation: Unable-to-think-up-handle)Back to the reality... -Time flies!One year ago, abusing fights was going on over Presidential election, both on conventional media and online. Putting aside the Presidential election itself and how people in the country in question feel about the current situation, I recall that back then, the word "fake news" became widely known rapidly.It could be more necessary to mind our country where abusing fights among newspaper companies are going on disgracefully in.Abusing fights between commentators on TV, neglecting what they must report, are nothing new. Is it OK to reprove them that they must not appropriate public media for their own use?Let me leave an idealistic theory which is too simple, fundamental and rudimentary that the purpose of news and media should be to inform people about various things we cannot confirm directly and give indications in social life scenes, from daily shopping to taking up politics, I suppose.It's true that general public's choice is changed by those indications given to them in case of events like national election.It means that news organs can be brainwashing system used as a tool for authorities, which is already obvious.Reports catering to panjandrums are accused online frequently these days.Once I wondered which should be wiser, media providers’ side and readers' side. But on the second thought, no matter how readers' side tries to be wiser, there are limitations -At least, most people are occupied with daily lives and job to earn livings.Before I took up this composition, a bizarre murder case that sacrificed nine people was revealed.This murder case is peculiar because the Culprit shrewdly lured out and murdered people who had been posting about suicide on Twitter.To conclude today's composition, I'd like to throw a question at media providers’side treating this hedonism murder case:Whether their intention is to raise questions about current society of despair that makes so many people desire to die, how to get along with social network services, and so on,Or all they care about is how to boost profits by raving up over this hedonism murder case, mixing it up with horror movie and trampling on victims' family and friends.Their excuse for sensationalism reports is usually readers' demand, including entertainers and officeholders' love affair.Then, this question is thrown at readers' side, too.◆:Ready to place summery if asked