Serene state of mind

　　

Some of various discriminating gaffes about gender by politicians and bureaucrats in our country have already spread all over the world, I suppose.
So could be a contribution by an assemblywoman saying that sexual minority people have no productivity because they don't have babies.
But today, I DON'T mention anything about issues related with sexual minority at all.

If "productivity" is identified with childbirth as this Assemblywoman wrote,
You could say that declining birth rate means whole "productivity" in our country is declining.
I'd like to throw a question at panjandrums whether they've thought about the backgrounds:
It's your mission to prepare environments and society to support families with children, isn't it?
Do you dispose of everything with self-responsibility of general public when it comes to issues of lives and family?
Especially women are demanded too much things and exhausted.
Equality of gender? "Utilizing women" you say is treating women as "honorary male", isn't it?
All became equal is hardship, making child-care and job even more incompatible.
There could be couples that either -or both- husband and wife are occupied with working long hours with little pay to earn daily living and no time and strength for trial to have babies left at the end of the days
-"Productivity" cannot improve under such situation.
If "Equality of gender" is men and women help each other in raising children, either of them are not laid labor and hardship unilaterally at both home and work,
Then "productivity" might improve.
So should productivity by original meaning. -Is it asking too much?

Before I took up with this composition, falsification of scores at entrance exam by medical colleges was revealed; they were deducting score of female applicants across the board.
Excuse by medical college's side is: Male doctors are more in demand at medical site because female doctors take maternity break and cannot work long if they have family, and they are annoying.
And I heard about a large printing company lamenting that the rate of female applicants is rising rapidly and it's getting harder to hire good male employees.
What do they expect in this period that we cannot even maintain livelihood unless both men and women work? High-growth period, when just husband's income was enough to support a family, is already the past.
Surely, when those moss-headed adults were young, bright future might have been assured if they devote themselves to work furiously for companies they belong to.
There is a question to those older adults:
Current situation in our country is coming partly from your generations' choice, isn't it? Including voting at elections.
We call it anachronism to force hardship and long working hours just because older generation went through the same hardship and harassments.
Men who have lived as company warriors than as fathers don't understand the current hardship of childcare.
Regardless of generation, there are men who still misunderstand pregnancy and childbirth as only female issues, unaware that both male and female are responsible for childbirth -I didn't consider artificial insemination
-Anything else? I got off the subject, sorry.
A question to panjandrums who launched economic policies that encouraged exploiting companies regarding workers as cost as a result:
　Current social situation in our country mentioned above -was it what you aimed at back then?
Another question to panjandrums:
　Is your goal to create exploitation power discarding not only domestic nations but also international labors like component parts?



-Did I make sense today? Why do I place today's composition on this category while it's meaningless to do so?
I'm aware that -just somehow.
Who is 350,000th visitor!?